Machine guarding · 29 CFR 1910.212California FACE 02CA009Incident: October 17, 2002 · Case released October 5, 2026

The drum was spinning.
The guard wasn’t there.

A wire-drawing machine pulled wire around an exposed rotating drum. The operator reached into the running machine. His glove caught in the wire, pulling him between the drum and its housing.

Anonymous AI illustration of an operator beside an exposed wire-drawing drum
005A · Before the accidentThe drum is accessible while running.
Non-gory AI illustration of a glove beginning to catch near wire on a rotating drum
005B · The failure beginsA glove catches in moving wire.
Anonymous AI illustration of the stopped machine with a repairman at the controls
005C · After the accidentThe power is stopped too late.

Case File 005 · Captioned visual film

The guard wasn’t there.

About this film: Narrated, with on-screen captions. AI-generated illustrative reenactment, not footage of the actual people, machine, or workplace. Machine details and staging are illustrative; the captions distinguish investigation findings from prevention lessons.

Incident basis · California FACE Report 02CA009Read the official report

Control first

Keep people out of the moving parts.

Guard the rotating drum and drawing hazards before operation. A safety stop is an additional safeguard; it does not replace a guard that prevents access.

01
My Safety Take

Training cannot substitute for a physical safeguard. If a guard or safety-critical stopping device is missing or defective, take the machine out of service until the hazard is corrected.

The documented record

What the investigation found.

California’s Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation (FACE) program investigated this accident. These findings are from its report, not an enforcement decision.

  1. 01The process

    The drum pulled wire through dies to reduce its diameter. Wire then traveled to a separate spooling mechanism.

  2. 02The missing safeguards

    The drum was unguarded. A hinged pressure-activated stop bar across the front had been disconnected. The control-panel emergency shutoff was not properly labeled.

  3. 03The entanglement

    The investigation concluded that the operator reached into the rotating-drum area. His glove caught in the wire and he was pulled between the drum and housing.

  4. 04The response

    A nearby repairman found him and turned off the power. Emergency responders attempted resuscitation. He was pronounced dead at the hospital.

  5. 05The operating system

    The employer had no machine-specific operating or safety instructions and no formal operator-training program.

What we do not know: The report does not establish why he reached toward the drum. No motive, precise hand motion, or dialogue is invented here. The source identifies no machine brand, serial number, or age. The AI visuals are explanatory staging.

The prevention plan

Four checks before the machine runs.

The first three follow the FACE recommendations; removing hazardous defective machinery from service also follows California’s equipment rule.

CONTROL 01

Guard the hazard

Prevent access to dangerous rotating parts and drawing points during operation. Choose safeguards appropriate to the actual machine.

CONTROL 02

Restore and identify safety stops

Keep required stopping devices installed, functional, maintained, and clearly identified. Never bypass them.

CONTROL 03

Train for this machine

Provide machine-specific operating procedures and training that explain the hazards, guards, and safety devices.

CONTROL 04

Stop use when safeguards fail

Do not operate machinery with hazardous defects. Have qualified personnel correct the condition before return to service.

Regulatory context

Guarding is the category. California governed the accident.

This case directly supports the federal OSHA Top 10 machine-guarding topic. Federal rules are educational context, not a claim that OSHA cited this California employer.

FEDERAL OSHA

29 CFR 1910.212

General machine guarding addresses hazards including rotating parts, ingoing nip points, and the point of operation. Guards must protect workers without creating another hazard.

CAL/OSHA

Wire-drawing stops and equipment condition

Title 8 §4234 addresses wire-drawing-machine stopping devices. §3328 prohibits use of hazardous defective machinery. §4002 addresses hazardous moving parts; point-of-operation requirements are addressed separately.

Current rules are prevention context. This page does not claim a citation, willful violation, or legal finding from the FACE report.

Source ledger

Read the record yourself.

Sources checked October 5, 2026.